FCATS Update: Edge AI Gets a Serious Boost


When I first built FCATS Katzenschreck, it was a fun proof of concept — a headless, AI-powered cat detection system running on small edge devices.

Now, it’s faster. Much faster.



🧠 From Raspberry Pi to Jetson Xavier NX

I’ve ported the entire inference script into a Docker container running on an NVIDIA Jetson Xavier NX Developer Board. The performance jump is incredible:

DeviceModelInference Time
Raspberry Pi 3YOLOv11x~50 seconds per frame
Raspberry Pi 4YOLOv11x~18 seconds per frame
Jetson Xavier NXYOLOv11x188 ms per frame

That’s not just faster — it’s real-time.

The Jetson can even host multiple inference containers simultaneously, so scaling across multiple cameras is finally practical.



🐈 Training with Real-World Data

Over the last two months, Katzenschreck has been quietly watching (24/7) a specific outdoor spot — collecting data on feline intruders.

I used this footage (~4.5 GB of JPEG frames) to fine-tune my model:

  • Re-labeled the dataset for precision.
  • Added data augmentation (lighting, perspective, random occlusion).
  • Retrained using YOLOv11x with my own MLOps pipeline for regular re-training.

The result? The system now detects cats more reliably, even in poor lighting or partial occlusions — and false positives dropped noticeably.



🧰 What’s Next

Next up, I’ll publish a detailed look at my improved model performance metrics — including confidence scores, precision-recall curves, and a few live comparison demos.

Stay tuned — and if you’ve ever wanted to see what happens when DevOps meets wildlife control, this might be the most overengineered example yet 😄

2 thoughts on “FCATS Update: Edge AI Gets a Serious Boost”

  1. Tag auch,
    ich feier Dein Projekt jetzt schon. Ich baue gerade die Hardware dafuer, Feuerloescherumbau zu Wasserwerfer, der per MQTT dann da mal ordentlich Wasser ueber die Katze feuert. Ich mag keine Katzen, fressen unsere Blindschleichen im Garten und killen aus Spass an der Freude unsere Voegel.
    Wasser ist die Loesung, ich muss nur noch ohne dieses Jetzson-Board klarkommen, das ist mir zu teuer.

    Gruss und danke
    Hans

  2. Hallo!
    Vom feinsten! Ein Jetson wird dafür nicht unbedingt benötigt. Initial hatte ich es ja selber auf einem Rapsi 3 & 4 laufen, der wesentlich leistungsschwächer ist. Viele Grüße, Andre

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *